john dooley wrote:
> 2) timeliness is the same with most of the systems regardless of > implementation as propretary or otherwise (sure point to point has some > speed advantages over email but on broadband its trivial), and there are Good point. And point-to-point doesn't really work with dialup, you need store-and-forward anyway. > 7) Of course, I am the kind of person that would like to accomodate as > wide an audience as I can, I would like to use standards and I would > really like to have the whole lot open sourced for the good of the > country, so please tell me specifically what I have to do to come up > with the openpgp easy method you are using! I doubt I can implement it > though...because of issues on my side of the chain. Can I draw you out on this a little, john? What sort of interfaces would need to exist at your end? What platforms? Would you have a daemon/service that scans a directory for files dumped by a local app (essentially the reverse of the GP system)? What sort of files? Do local path systems produce PIT directly? Is the MLLP (simple HL7 over TCP) used at all? Or would you need some form of GUI for your typist to enter in reports directly? Or does the typist insist on Word? (as for other specialists) Ian _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
