I suspect that an apology to Peter M is in order as well? David de Bhál www.v-practice.com ________________________________
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Machell Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 7:49 PM To: General Practice Computing Group Talk Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Re: AMH Response to General Practice Computing Talk On 27/07/2006, at 6:42 PM, David de Bhál wrote: > I promise not to hold you responsible and absolve you of any > responsibility > for publishing my occasional political incorrectnesses and any > misspellings > or any adverse reference to AMH, mr Farrell his heirs and executives. David, could you change "publishing" to "enabling me to publish" and include everyone you are likely to offend, then send me a signed copy? > THinus needs new glasses. I don't see any fault in what Thinus posted - just a childish over- reaction to a bit of criticism that should have been taken as an opportunity. Thinus was not the only one to receive a threatening letter. Peter._______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/401 - Release Date: 7/26/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/401 - Release Date: 7/26/2006 _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
