[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be courteous of them to put the extra 2 years contractual
obligation at the top of the
agreement, instead of 7/8 down a long license agreeement obscured by a
textbox.
This license agreement appears like a standard intellectual propeties
and warranties agreement,
but then adds the extra contractual obligation for the purchaser near
the bottom. The standard
behaviour of a purchaser would be to think this is a standard software
IP and warranties agrrement
and click I agree without reading the long legalese .
gee, that sounds suspiciously like a deceptive business practice... i
wonder who is responsible for authorising the website content ?
unless of course it was just poor design and oversight
but i expect we won't know unless there are leeches applied
ash
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
