On Wednesday 09 August 2006 17:02, Michael Tooth wrote: > > attend for pathology, radiology, specialist appointments and general > > recalls. It seems to me that this makes a computerised medical record > > compulsory. Apparently, MD3 would fail as well. Their recall function > > moves patients from the "Recall" list to the "Action" list when the > > That's the point that I will drop out of any accreditation, as it is an > impossible ask ...
Same here. Next Tuesday we are facing our probably last re-accreditation We won't quit that nonsense because it is too expensive to keep up with their ludicrous demands - we will quit because it is a policy of blame shifting and denial of personal responsibility they are promulgating, a moronising cultural shift we want no part in. We want a system where patients (except for mentally disabled and young children) have to take responsibility for their own decisions. If they are informed why they should have a test or see a specialist and decide not to do so, it should be THEIR problem and theirs alone. If I provide a reminder system it should be a courtesy and not a "right" they can sure me for. Damn the RACGP and all their ivory tower paper pushers for coming up with such poorly thought through "standard", and twice damn the self serving accreditation industry that is soooo happy about all this because it justifies their otherwise unjustifiable existence. I nearly vomited when I got their recent advertising pamphlet with their "exciting news with exciting new development". I can do without such excitement. Horst _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
