Hear, hear !
Horst Herb wrote: > On Wednesday 09 August 2006 17:02, Michael Tooth wrote: > >>>attend for pathology, radiology, specialist appointments and general >>>recalls. It seems to me that this makes a computerised medical record >>>compulsory. Apparently, MD3 would fail as well. Their recall function >>>moves patients from the "Recall" list to the "Action" list when the >> >>That's the point that I will drop out of any accreditation, as it is an >>impossible ask ... > > > Same here. > Next Tuesday we are facing our probably last re-accreditation > > We won't quit that nonsense because it is too expensive to keep up with their > ludicrous demands - we will quit because it is a policy of blame shifting and > denial of personal responsibility they are promulgating, a moronising > cultural shift we want no part in. > > We want a system where patients (except for mentally disabled and young > children) have to take responsibility for their own decisions. > If they are informed why they should have a test or see a specialist and > decide not to do so, it should be THEIR problem and theirs alone. > > If I provide a reminder system it should be a courtesy and not a "right" > they > can sure me for. > > Damn the RACGP and all their ivory tower paper pushers for coming up with > such > poorly thought through "standard", and twice damn the self serving > accreditation industry that is soooo happy about all this because it > justifies their otherwise unjustifiable existence. I nearly vomited when I > got their recent advertising pamphlet with their "exciting news with exciting > new development". I can do without such excitement. > > Horst > _______________________________________________ > Gpcg_talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk > > _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
