Horst Herb wrote:

It failed as expected and predicted, and the vast sums of taxpayers money disappeared with a fraction of the benefit that could have been achieved by investing in public broadband infrastructure that could have been leased at *equitable terms* to all competitors.

Horst,

The basic problem you've touched on is that this government doesn't believe in public infrastructure.

If the 'market' with a little help, can't fix it, it won't be fixed by massive injections of money into 'public infrastructure' of any kind.

The basic reason why HealthConnect has become a 'standards framework', not a health communication system, is that the current government can't bring itself to invest large sums ['many billions of dollars'] in a public infrastructure venture.

$1 billion re broadband doesn't really compare, and, anyway, the government has a schizophrenic view of Telstra, as being not public, despite the government being the majority shareholder, and likely to remain so for quite some time, I suspect.

The last examples of big new public infrastructure investment I can think of was the Alice Springs to Darwin railway and our recent defence expenditures. Part of the rationale for this railway was 'northern defence' anyway.

Most of our public health infrastructure is run at state level, with funding from the Federal government inputted via the Commonwealth-State funding agreement arrangements.

In addition, the Federal government pays the public's cost of consultations with private doctors through Medicare but this 'health infrastructure' is held in private hands, like yours Horst.

Greg


--
Greg Twyford
Information Management & Technology Program Officer
Canterbury Division of General Practice
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph.: 02 9787 9033
Fax: 02 9787 9200

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
***********************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail and their attached files,
including replies and forwarded copies, are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged or prohibited
from disclosure and unauthorised use. If you are not the intended
recipient, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
modification, distribution and/or publication or any action taken or
omitted to be taken in reliance upon this message or its attachments is
prohibited.

All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by
law.
***********************************************************************

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to