Ian Cheong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> At 9:14 am +1000 15/8/06, Tim Churches wrote:
> >Ian Cheong wrote:
> >  > At 8:28 am +1000 15/8/06, Tim Churches wrote:
> >  > When one invests a seven digit sum of public money, the clock is 
> running
> >>  to demonstrate effectiveness within a political cycle.
> >
> >Does that also apply to the nine-digit sum of public money invested in
> >HealthConnect/MediConnect? I suppose it does, since these programmes
> >have undergone a very quiet involution some two electoral cycles are
> >their inception.
> >
> >Tim C
> 
> Absolutely. (I thought 8 digits?) Those projects are clear 
> demonstrations of political risk management and "plug pulling" 
> prowess.

I recall seeing mention of $100 million expenditure on HealthConnect and 
MediConnect since 1999. That's nine digits, isn't it?

Tim C
> 
> Ian.
> -- 
> Dr Ian R Cheong, BMedSc, FRACGP, GradDipCompSc, MBA(Exec)
> Health Informatics Consultant, Brisbane, Australia
> Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (for urgent matters, please send a copy to my practice email as well: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> 
> PRIVACY NOTE
> I am happy for others to forward on email sent by me to public email 
> lists.
> Please ask my permission first if you wish to forward private email 
> to other parties.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to