Tim Churches wrote:
Ian Cheong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 9:14 am +1000 15/8/06, Tim Churches wrote:
Ian Cheong wrote:
> At 8:28 am +1000 15/8/06, Tim Churches wrote:
> When one invests a seven digit sum of public money, the clock is
running
to demonstrate effectiveness within a political cycle.
Does that also apply to the nine-digit sum of public money invested in
HealthConnect/MediConnect? I suppose it does, since these programmes
have undergone a very quiet involution some two electoral cycles are
their inception.
Tim C
Absolutely. (I thought 8 digits?) Those projects are clear
demonstrations of political risk management and "plug pulling"
prowess.
I recall seeing mention of $100 million expenditure on HealthConnect and
MediConnect since 1999. That's nine digits, isn't it?
Ian and Tim,
I December 2004, Rob Wooding was talking 11 digits. That was when I
reckoned it was all over.
Greg
--
Greg Twyford
Information Management & Technology Program Officer
Canterbury Division of General Practice
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph.: 02 9787 9033
Fax: 02 9787 9200
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
***********************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail and their attached files,
including replies and forwarded copies, are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged or prohibited
from disclosure and unauthorised use. If you are not the intended
recipient, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
modification, distribution and/or publication or any action taken or
omitted to be taken in reliance upon this message or its attachments is
prohibited.
All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by
law.
***********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
