> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Twyford > Sent: Monday, 21 August 2006 10:41 AM
> Until earlier this year I'd formed the opinion that the use > of individual HeSa certificates, as opposed to location > certificates, was dead. HeSa and MA had made them 'optional' > for its online claiming, in their efforts to get GPs using > that system, which, of course, marginalised their > distribution for other uses. > > However, in March Andrew Macintyre convinced me that they do > have a role What is that role? What did Andrew MacIntyre say to convince you? How does signing with an individual key significantly improve on the communication from the point of view of the person receiving that communication? I am talking about clinical messages sent between GPs, specialists and other providers who are jointly caring for patients. I am not talking about business transactions or other confidential communications in the non medical world. Oliver Frank, general practitioner 255 North East Road, Hampstead Gardens South Australia 5086 Ph. 08 8261 1355 Fax 08 8266 5149 _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
