Agree with Horst - the energy involved in getting "buyin" is too great.
R
Dr John Van Dyck wrote:
Listen, all, to these words of hard-won wisdom.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Horst Herb
Sent: Wednesday, 20 September 2006 8:25 AM
To: General Practice Computing Group Talk
Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] hypothetical
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 17:55, Tony Eviston wrote:
a group of enthusiasts can pull it off. Getting groups with a bit more
leverage involved from the start would be desirable from my point of view.
As desirable as getting a leg amputated before you get into starting
position
in a race.
If you involve such organization and their funding you will be bogged down
in
endless (and fruitless) discussions, waste your energy in a zillion of
useless sub-committees, spend most of your funds on unproductive talkfests,
and you have to tip-toe through minefields of political correctness where it
becomes impossible to tell idiots that they are idiots and instead you have
to allow them to waste your time.
I think I have learnt a lot from past mistakes. What I think would work is a
small private investment buying software contractors's time to implement
specific tasks within a specific time frame.
Horst
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
