Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 22:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we hit the spot we will have something that at least
performs up to the current EDIS but can do better with functionality for
clinicians,
that wouldn't take much.
the user interface is dreadful.
and the automated letters it produces - their only selling point is
legibility.
i concur, albeit with the admission that i haven't had to use it for
almost 3 years
the window for typing is as big as ant poop
the database is laughable - more driven by popular myth than real life
(eg. no # scaphoid, but severed penis is there - i know what i've seen
more of in my time)
very little opportunity for uncertain diagnosis (as if the final
diagnosis is known at the time of separation from e.d.)
as a means for logging time of presentation / assessment and disposal it
has some possible use
for anything else it is a non-solution
ash
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
