On Monday 16 October 2006 08:55, Oliver Frank wrote: > How do you mean, you "would not would not support online claiming in the > first instance"? Do you mean that you are philosophically opposed to > it? If so, why? Or is there some other reason that you would not > support it?
I think he means that in the first implementation it would be too much work; we get non-online billing running first because this is what most of us (?) do, and then worry about online billing in a separate project I think we should now focus on getting something working *quick* that covers most needs, and then bolt the extra bells and whistles on afterwards. No problem as long as the general architecture allows this easily enough Horst _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
