> John Mackenzie wrote:
> > But an Argus version which doesn't require any
> > registration code allows pathology and radiology
> > companies to use Argus free, and denies Argus
> > their proposed source of revenue.
Those evil pathologists. How dare they.

Seriously, can I confirm: all the players are now committed to the 
cross-subsidy business model?

On Saturday 11 November 2006 10:01, David Guest wrote:
> I'd prefer a model where the source code was GPLed but the binaries
> could be purchased if you so chose. The rev heads here and the radpath
> companies would compile their own but the average GP surgery will need
> assistance. It would be a turn around for Argus' business model.
But they don't want to turn, as it seems nobody outside this list would sign 
on to this model, although eventually somebody at Mayne or Dorevitch (or, God 
forbid, a public hospital) is going to wonder why they are paying for IT 
support for GPs.

> P.S. I note that Argus 4.2 is not GPLed. :-(((
How is it licensed? The website doesn't say. Will the code ever appear?

Ian

Attachment: pgpNAn2bjKQ3D.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to