Ian Haywood wrote: > But they don't want to turn, as it seems nobody outside this list would sign > on to this model, Ian
I know this is the historical view but I don't taken it as a given. It's a pity about Argus and the dropping of its GPL. It's a pity it requires HeSA keys. However it is probably because of the latter that it was selected as the preferred method of communication between the local Area Health Service and GPs. This endorses the product in our area to a large extent. The environment up here is now ripe for Argus to come up and do mass installations as per their one time business model. Personally I would pay for someone to get communication going between our surgery at the Lismore Base Hospital using Argus. I can, and probably will have to do it, but I would be interested in a techie doing it remotely at a reasonable fee. I did this in about 20 minutes earlier this week for a reinstallation of Medical Objects. I suspect there are other GPs in Oliver and John Mac's Divisions who would be similarly interested. The medcomms environment is changing, slowly, the old rules don't universally apply. David
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
