On Saturday 11 November 2006 15:09, Elizabeth Dodd wrote: > On Saturday 11 November 2006 15:02, Ian Haywood wrote: > > As an example, > > currently discharges are faxed by me [1] on the fax machine costing > > 15c/call, more importantly, no-one else in the organisation has to get > > involved. > > And your time? Are the numbers programmed in the fax machine? do you spend > time getting the number? My time is free (i.e. I stop getting paid at 5pm and if I'm stuck back faxing discharge summaries, tough for me) Fortunately that doesn't happen too often in my current job. The other registrars have an even better solution, unfortunately I suspect we don't get enough "n" to measure the difference in re-admission rates, which I'm sure exists.
> And if Ian writes illegibly, well, I'll turn the paper round and round, > hold it up to the light, do anything, but never work out what that > medication is. Liz I type 'em, would you believe, to the great consternation of nurses who want to check e-mail on the aforementioned ward computer. I suspect I've got 1-2 more weeks before they complain to the NUM and I have to go back to writing by hand (which is indeed quite illegible) Ian
pgpHZAZUymK0L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
