Greg Twyford wrote:

My understanding, and I'm happy to be corrected, is that:

RACGP standards require electronic clinical messages to be encrypted.

Correct. In addition the new criteria for tier 1 of the IM/IT PIP payments requires encryption of clinical data being transmitted.

Medicare and an Act of Parliament require electronic referrals to be digitally signed using the HeSA individual key to be a valid referral for Medicare rebate purposes.


The Medicare Australia Website at:

http://www9.health.gov.au/mbs/fullDisplay.cfm?type=note&q=6&qt=NoteID

states:

"6.2.1 A "referral" is a request to a specialist or a consultant physician for investigation, opinion, treatment and/or management of a condition or problem of a patient or for the performance of a specific examination(s) or test(s).

(..)

(ii) the instrument of referral must be in writing by way of a letter or note to a specialist or to a consultant physician and must be signed and dated by the referring practitioner"


This does not say that the signing has to be digital - probably because they think that we are still in the 1960s. Where have you seen any reference to referrals having to be signed digitally?


Your 'hundreds or thousands of doctors around Australia' are playing an interesting game. How long before a Z-car turns up on someone's doorstep?

I am willing to bet you a bottle of Cooper's Ale (Sparkling, thanks) that it will be never, because I believe that Medicare would not dare to try to prosecute a specialist *only* because he or she used 'referred rate' item numbers when the electronic referral was not digitally signed. I believe that the only context in which Medicare Australia would mention this in a prosecution would be if there was also fraud, that is, the patients had not in fact been referred at all or their referral had expired.

--
Oliver Frank, general practitioner
255 North East Road, Hampstead Gardens, South Australia 5086
Phone 08 8261 1355   Fax 08 8266 5149  Mobile 0407 181 683
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to