Ian Cheong wrote:
> At 8:39 am +1100 23/12/06, Tim Churches wrote:
>> [...]>
>>>  The Auspath codes are here:
>>>  http://www.austpath.uow.edu.au/index.cgi
>>
>> Thanks, forgot to include that URL in my post.
>>
>>>  lack of revision could mean one of two things:
>>>  1. lack of use - which probably applies to request codes
>>>  2. good fitness for purpose - which probably applies to report codes
>>>  sent routinely in HL7 messages daily.
>>
>> Over the last 18 months we have been talking to a lot of labs with a NSW
>> presence, both public and private sector, regarding electronic
>> communicable disease reporting, and the take-up of and enthusiasm for
>> LOINC request and result codes seems very low. One large lab that we
>> have dealt with seems to use them, the rest don't.
> 
> Was Michael Legg involved in discussions?????

Yes he was.

Tim C
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to