In other words, if your system did everything else ( e.g. secure repository, authentication, template retrieval, networked store, networked plugins ,applied to health records domain), but didn't do the bit about giving the patient the screen to select a health provider and what parts of his record to share, then your system wouldn't be infringing on their patent , right ?
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 10:27 +1100, syan tan wrote: > > The most original part of the claim would be " the consumer selecting > items of personal health data to share and identifying a health care > provider, or class of health care providers, to whom access will be > provided for those items of personal health data;", and everything > else > is prior art. e.g Mumps/Vista > _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
