maybe there should be hyperlinks, so that you can you
could satisfy lurkers who want a glimpse of your technical
knowledge, as well as people who want rhetoric.

On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 15:16 +1000, Peter Machell wrote:
> On 11/02/2007, at 12:09 PM, Horst Herb wrote:
> 
> > On Saturday 10 February 2007 22:51, Peter Machell wrote:
> > 
> > > Vista is a lot better out of the box than any MS OS before it,
> > > but  
> > > 
> > > probably not more reliable than XP SP2, which is (finally) a  
> > > 
> > > reasonably mature and securable system.
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > I'd suggest reading recent reports in the German IT magazine c't
> > where they 
> > 
> > thoroughly dissect Vista and revise that statement
> > 
> 
> 
> I said it was better out of the box, as in, a better first release
> than anything they've done before. That's not to say that it's not
> full of bugs or that I'll be recommending it to anyone - my own
> conclusions are here:
> 
> 
> http://www.mobilecomputing.net.au/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=22
> 
> regards,
> Peter.
> _______________________________________________
> Gpcg_talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to