On Sunday 11 February 2007 13:44, Tim Churches wrote:
> And I'm told that you can forget running Vista on any PC with less than
> 2GB of RAM, and even then your application won't have much space to play
> in, and thus 4GB of RAM is not overkill for Vista. And if you want the
> "Aero" translucent windows and other eye-candy, then you need an
> accelerated 3D graphics card with at lest 512MB of dedicated graphics
> memory (i.e. most laptops and many current desktops are out - you'll
> only see graphics which are very similar to those in Win XP). Oh, as
> Horst say, it had better be a graphics card for which Vista drivers are
> available. Oh, and forget installing 64-bit Vista on your 64-bit CPU (as
> almost all CPUs are these days), as there are almost no 64-bit Vista
> device drivers available for anything, let alone graphics cards, and no,
> the 32-bit drivers don't work on 64-bit Vista.
>
> Tim C
so for something that takes longer than Debian to be ready - it ought to be as
ready as Debian is instead of still beta
--
Remark of Dr. Baldwin's concerning upstarts: We don't care to eat toadstools
that think they are truffles.
-- Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar"
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
