it was an opportunity to see what bouncycastle was about, but everything is about indemnity , and no one is going to indemnify non-authorized public key certificate chains. BTW, I think EHR stalling is like the Gulf War, too much money to be made in keeping things futile than in progressing.
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 10:39 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > It sounds to me as if ArgusConnect may just as well get on with helping > > users and potential users to obtain their digital certificates > > elsewhere, from whichever source is easiest, and enable Argus to use > > those certificates. > This has been discussed previously at length. > > To recap: > Advantages: > - free > - easy to get > - more secure as users can generate own private keys. > > Diadvantages: > - not a legal referral in Medicare's eyes, (these require Individual > certificates which no-one uses) > - no communication with existing HeSA certificate holders. Although > technically > possible the HeSA EUA explicitly states this is forbidden > - Does not require a centralised infastructure. In Australia this is a > disadvantage, has many people simply aren't comfortable unless it's Official, > Accreditted, Certified, etc. > > > > http://www.certificates-australia.com.au/general/cert_search_health.shtm > > > > but my experience of using this Web site has been that it is not very > > helpful anyway. > This functionality is trivial to replicate. > > Ian > _______________________________________________ > Gpcg_talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk > _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
