On Saturday 24 February 2007 22:05, David More wrote: > The CCHIT is happening, its working and there is 'stuff all' happening in > OZ along the same - very important - lines. Ostrich all you like - this is > fundamentally good stuff CCHIT are doing and it is being done on the 'smell > or an oily rag' in a relative sense. > > Seems you want to have poor quality non-interoperable GP software to go on > forever in OZ - or have I got it wrong and you really would like some > decent quality control etc? i'm just trying to sort out how to pronounce the acronym does it have soft Cs like C-Chit ?
-- We totally deny the allegations, and we're trying to identify the allegators. _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
