That's because you are in Melbourne, the rest of us miss out electronic 
downloads.
 The rest of Australia doesnt exist. 

Except that after writing yesterdays email on this subject, I phoned Symbion
Dorevitch (Melbourne) and requested download of latest result posted as paper,
and lo, an electronic version appeared - so they CAN do it, but you have
to ask each time :(

felicity Goswell RN DipPracMgt FAAPM
Practice Nurse/Manager
Nillo Surgery
www.drsref.com.au


>-- Original Message --
>Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:02:07 +1100
>From: John Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: General Practice Computing Group Talk <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Electronic communication with the National Bowel
>       Cancer Screening Program Register
>Reply-To: General Practice Computing Group Talk <[email protected]>
>
>
>Excellent letter, Oliver. 
>
>The only communication I have had with the Bowel Cancer
>Screening Program (other than the usual blurb announcing the
>program launch) has been to receive occult faecal blood test
>results from our local pathology laboratories via the usual
>electronic downloads.
>
>John Mac
>
>> Oliver Frank wrote:
>
>> Dear National Bowel Cancer Screening Program,
>>
>> I have just learned that the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program
>> Register is planning to communicate with GPs on paper.  As I
>> understand it, the Register is intending to send GPs paper forms to
>> complete, intending to ask GPs to write to it on paper about patients
>> and intending to deliver test results on paper.
>>
>> Did you know that the federal government has devoted millions of
>> dollars to e-Health, that almost all general practices receive their
>> pathology results electronically and that there is massive activity
>> around the country in implementing electronic clinical messaging
>> systems that are helping to improve the quality of care by making
>> communication faster, cheaper and more reliable and the communicated
>> information more useable?
>>
>> In view of these developments in electronic communication within the
>> health system, can you explain the reasons for your decision to
>> communicate on paper or via a Web page that is merely the electronic
>> equivalent of filling in a paper form?
>>
>> What GPs want, need and expect from the National Bowel Cancer
>> Screening Program Register is intelligent electronic communication as
>> the default method of communication.  Intelligent electronic
>> communication is happening now by using templates that automatically
>> assemble for transmission the required information about each patient
>> from that which we have already entered into our practice computer
>> systems, and then sending that assembled information via an electronic
>> clinical messaging system.
>>
>> There are a number electronic clinical messaging systems available in
>> Australia.  The Argus clinical messaging system is the leader in
>> desirable features, including the facts that it is the only
>> non-commercial system in wide use and that it imposes no charges to
>> send or receive messages.  I suggest that the National Bowel Cancer
>> Screening Program Register urgently discusses its messaging needs with
>> the provider of Argus, ArgusConnect (www.argusconnect.com.au).
>>
>> Please will you reply and let me know the Program's and the Register's
>> attitude to this issue and what action the Program and the Register
>> are taking to implement intelligent electronic communication with GPs?
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gpcg_talk mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to