The sheer contempt of any software company stopping a doctor moving his/her
notes and medical records to keep them hostage to the software package is
extraordinary. Encryption by MD3, Profile or others is inexcusable if you do
not hold the keys or you are unable to readily and easily export to a text
based format!

Consider Quick book MYOB low level commercial accounting software. You can
pick the best product for year to year with little or no risk of being stuck
with a second rate product.

The inability to export and import your private copyright material - medical
records should be a key reason to 'dump' any software that is forcing this
on you. I know the ridiculously (stupidly) high number of medical software
providers in Australia will not last if a competent and effective package is
developed which has the required level of customer support. I wonder if
quicken or MYOB would have a go?

If this forum has be talking about this since 1998 I think it may be part of
the problem?

Regards
 
James Bishop
Longevity Medical
Ph  03 98482009
Fax 03 98407064
Mb  0413582615
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of john hilton
Sent: Thursday, 15 March 2007 3:06 PM
To: General Practice Computing Group Talk
Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] [Fwd: Re: Standards for software used in
generalpractice]

On Thursday 15 March 2007 6:51 am, Ian Cheong wrote:
> They are happy to implement import. Export is less important.

I disagree. Export, full useable export, would make trial of software
feasible 
and promote real competition. (as someone trying to change/try another and 
can't get data out)

jh
-- 
MIKE: Well, if you're going to sin, you might as well be original.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to