(I am sending this again as it did not come though on the list - to me anyway!)
Dear All, Assuming that the message generators (Path, DI, AHS etc) receive ACKs from GP software (not download software) , I am interested to hear views on what the process around responding to the non acknowledged messages might look like (e.g at the Pathology Lab end). Given that Surgeries close from time to time and servers may be turned off, GPs may be on leave and not clear their holding area etc. So how long would Path companies wait until they contacted the surgery in response to non acknowledged messages? Would the Path providers rank their tests by importance (a sort of non-ACK retention time before action protocol)? What would the action be? Would the system generate a hard copy report to be posted thus discharging the companies responsibility? Even if this did happen would the GP still get to see the result? Chris Scott Chief Information Officer Hunter Urban Division of General Practice Tel: 02 4925 2259 Mobile: 0413 945 564 Help Desk: 02 4929 1000 http://www.hudgp.org.au <blocked::http://www.hudgp.org.au/> NOTICE - This message (including any attached files) is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or take any action based upon it. If you received this message in error please notify the Hunter Urban Division of General Practice immediately (+61 2 4925 2259). Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of the Hunter Urban Division of General Practice.
_______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
