Horst Herb wrote:
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 09:52, Andrew McIntyre wrote:
Our position it that we we should be using common open interfaces and
that the interface to the clinical system should also be standard
(Ideally the same in fact).
Guess that would solve nearly all of our current health IT problems - but also
guess that a vendor you stand pretty much isolated with your position (except
for the good Argus people, if we consider them as vendors), the rest seems to
depend entirely on vendor-lock-in and secrecy.
Shame, wish there would be more vendors like you
Horst,
You've nicely encapsulated one of the reasons why many of us in Division
land will do business with MO and ArgusConnect, but not otherwise.
Not all of us, however.
Greg
--
Greg Twyford
Information Management & Technology Program Officer
Canterbury Division of General Practice
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph.: 02 9787 9033
Fax: 02 9787 9200
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
***********************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail and their attached files,
including replies and forwarded copies, are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged or prohibited
from disclosure and unauthorised use. If you are not the intended
recipient, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
modification, distribution and/or publication or any action taken or
omitted to be taken in reliance upon this message or its attachments is
prohibited.
All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by
law.
***********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
