Horst Like me I see you like the stick approach. A few weeks ago when I dared mention the stick approach on this forum, some user immediately jumped on me. Hopefully now that you prefer the stick approach, I might be forgiven.
Cedric -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Horst Herb Sent: Wednesday, 21 March 2007 9:46 PM To: General Practice Computing Group Talk Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] special report to Dr Frank On Wednesday 21 March 2007 12:27, Elizabeth Dodd wrote: > we got the electronic messaging onto the agenda for yesterday's > meeting of BCSP-PAG at the DoHA. i am bound by the usual secrecy > provisions. One way out of Australia's health IT misery would be devising a little daemon with a bamboo cane that immediately materializes and heartily smacks the wrists of any public servant using or applying the word "secrecy". There is absolutely no place for secrecy in tax funded projects and undertakings -all this "commercial in confidence" nonsense in *public* projects has invariably led to grief in the past (just look at that Sydney tunnel dung pile) and will invariably lead to more grief in the future. There is a single purpose in secrecy in such context - stifling or suppressing competition and critique. I doubt this is in the interest of the funding entity, the long suffering tax payer. Intelligent people like you Liz should not cooperate in such heresy against common sense. Secrecy is the very anathema of messaging after all! Horst _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
