Peter MacIsaac wrote:
David,
As a mail administrator you get no extra mail with SPAM Arrest - the email
challenge goes to the sender!
I think we are saying the same thing. The 1200 grey listing messages I
get per day are from spammers who have used an address in our domain. If
I were to get one of your SPAM Arrest messages it would be lost in the
crowd.
In anycase surely the modus operandi of greylisting is to bounce in a way
that a genuine mail server will send again without human intervention.
Yes, mostly. :-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grey_listing#Disadvantages
SPAM ARREST is a much smarter system than Greylisting - I apologise if I
didn’t explain this clearly enough.
OK. I don't know much about Spam Arrest and will check it out.
There is a cost - anyone that wants to email to me effectively has to
register (unless they were on my original upload list). This takes less than
a minute - I hope I am worth it!
And this is probably better that the proposal to charge a fraction of a
cent per transmitted email. This would be a minor expense for users but
put the spammers out of business. It's then a question of where that
money would go. I suggest Microsoft. They're very big on malaria research.
David
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
