Tim,
I agree with your summation here. Those are pretty precisely the economics for 
the build of what is required. Outstanding components, of course, are Patient, 
Product and Provider identifiers so that the business models can be evolved. 
Perhaps we could start with a philanthropic health fund and we will use their 
identifiers to make a start for the Patient, and their identifiers for 
Providers, and we will just make a decision about Product identifiers from 
preliminary guidelines coming out of NEHTA.... and bingo all we then need is a 
sustainable business model based around an annual contribution from consumers 
(possibly) for the benefits they will derive. 
Regards
John Johnston

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tim Churches 
        Sent: Tue 4/3/2007 7:01 AM 
        To: General Practice Computing Group Talk 
        Cc: 
        Subject: [GPCG_TALK] Ultimate EMR
        
        

        Well, that's its name. It is a new, open source, Web-based EMR for the
        US market, based on Zope and Plone, which are intriguing but probably
        quite sound choices for infrastructure (uses an object database, not a
        relational database - makes much sense for clinical data). See
        http://www.uemr.com/index.html
        
        Probably not usable as-is in the Oz setting, but yet another
        demonstration that it *is* possible to create viable open source
        clinical apps with very modest investment. They mention "four years of
        effort", probably by one to three people - thus around 10 person-years
        of effort. That's around $1.5-2.0 million of investment. Would be money
        well spent by a govt agency or even a private philanthropic concern in
        the Australian setting (or even sponsorship by a private health
        insurance company - what better way to promote yourself but to have
        posters in GPs' waiting rooms say "the computer software used by this
        practice is proudly sponsored by...". No need to wait 4 years: half a
        dozen smart people could do it in 12-18 months, with increasingly
        polished prototypes to show off and get active feedback at monthly
        intervals along the way. That's what Australian patients and health
        professionals deserve.
        
        Tim C
        _______________________________________________
        Gpcg_talk mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
        


John Johnston
Pen Computer Systems Pty Ltd
Level 6, The Barrington
10-14 Smith Street 
Parramatta NSW 2150
Ph: (02) 9635 8955
Fax: (02) 9635 8966

<<winmail.dat>>

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to