syan tan wrote: > To be honest, it looks like about 3 weeks of after day job work, > munching dinner at the computer perhaps, lacking somewhat due to the > designers' not having used emrs before, and looks like they just throw > together what is available in the middle ware. should be a good > investment for work put in, if anyone ends up using it ; at least it > is competition for something like openemr ; specifically, the critical > points about their screenshots is that the past history lists lack > complexity, each page of the application of the screenshot looks like > a doctor's letter with a letterhead, which makes you suspect it isn't > a particular good use of screen real estate, the prescribing section > looks like a generic database row entry frontend , so you wonder > how much programming thought went into that section too.
Yes, yes, I know, and it is riddled with typos too. I am not recommending it for serious consideration. I was trying to make a political point, Syan, about the eminent feasibility of creating a "reference" open-source EMR for Australia, and how the very modest funding of such an initiative would benefit patients, health professionals, health care institutions, government agencies, researchers and just about everyone else except the entrenched vendors of primary care medical software, about whom we don't give two hoots. Tim C _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
