All, Deliberately to list <grin>
I thought I had checked - have been caught before! Silly me! The essence of my criticism of this document is that while it understands and catalogues some of the key problems in the Health Sector as a whole it really does not say how to do anything practical to fix it - but says there is a lot of money to be saved seemingly based on an old (2004) HealthConnect study. There is a lot of other very relevant research that is not cited in this document. I happen to think there is lots to be saved..but an investment is needed and to have that happen a hard nosed practical business case is needed to extract money from Mr Costello etc. This document is not even a useful contribution to that as it really has nothing we have not all seen many times before IMVHO. I want to see a real business case developed that will actually convince Treasury - and this or the NEHTA work are not near that target yet. Cheers David ---- Dr David G More MB, PhD, FACHI Phone +61-2-9438-2851 Fax +61-2-9906-7038 Skype Username : davidgmore E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HealthIT Blog - www.aushealthit.blogspot.com On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:52:21 +1000, David Guest wrote: > David More wrote: >> Hi Ken, >> >> *Not on the list reply.* > Some people think the default reply to should be the sender not the list. > Peter has implemented both and this is not unreasonable but as always it is wisest > to double check your To fields before hitting send. > > No harm done with this reply however since we await David's more considered > blog reply. > > David > > _______________________________________________ > Gpcg_talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk > > __________ NOD32 2209 (20070421) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
