Yeah...I agree. All very well for D.More to be quite cynical about
what K.Harvey has to say, but as far as I can see, he, his blog and many
like him have been discussing this problem for bloody ages without
solving it. Meanwhile old hands like myself are battling in an area
where the sharing of information and knowledge is absolutely appalling.
It's every man for himself in my area and the rest of you can get
focussed. I try my damnedest to organise for others to be able to
access patient information belonging to my practice, but there is no
help and it is mostly ignored. So-called confidential information is
still being sent by fax all over the place. The hospital service is
probably the worst in this regard, but no-one gets off scot free.
Every time someone tries to improve things there are a multitude of
cleverer people who find all sorts of faults with it and it lapses and
withers away. There are a multitude of commercial entrepreneurs trying
to make money with all sorts of software, but they rarely co-operate and
often deliberately sabotage one another,. The whole system is bloody
lousy. Cheers. :-) Greg M
Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Sunday 22 April 2007 11:06, David More wrote:
I want to see a real business case developed that will actually convince
Treasury - and this or the NEHTA work are not near that target yet.
well, getting in now, and someone like Ken able to say "this is just rhetoric,
we need an actual plan"
is the way to go
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
