On Fri, 4 May 2007 09:01:38 +1200
Tom Bowden wrote to Andrew McIntyre:

..... "Lastly you comment that Medical Objects is able to make things
work that
we cant. I know the instance you are talking about and I'd like to share
with readers the comment (direct written quote) of the CEO of the group
of doctors involved. 
" Messaging involves a series of trade offs between high quality IT
process and the need for the messages from a GP functional end. " 

I was aghast that Medical Objects and this customer could possibly view
clinical communications as a set of trade-offs and I will let readers
judge for themselves.  Is the Medical Objects' approach of "Lets get by
with a few trade-offs" an appropriate one?" ....


Tom,
Are you referring to HUDGP? If you are, then this is well out of context
to what was discussed last year - which was:

1. Messaging in this county does not work uniformly well across all GP
Medical applications
2. There is a need for messaging now, so messaging providers need to
provide a service that adjusts to differences in the way GP applications
receive and respond. It has to be more than 'what goes in drops out the
other side'.
3. We don't live in perfect world and have to get on with it.
4. This country needs standardisation and is well behind.
5. A solution will involve all parties.

Chris.
 

Chris Scott

Chief Information Officer

Hunter Urban Division of General Practice

Tel: 02 4925 2259

Mobile: 0413 945 564

Help Desk: 02 4929 1000

http://www.hudgp.org.au <blocked::http://www.hudgp.org.au/>  

NOTICE - This message (including any attached files) is intended only for the 
use of the addressee named above and may contain privileged and confidential 
information. 

If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not disseminate, 
copy or take any action based upon it. If you received this message in error 
please notify the Hunter Urban Division of General Practice immediately (+61 2 
4925 2259). 

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except 
where the sender specifically states them to be the views of the Hunter Urban 
Division of General Practice.


_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to