Agreed.

From what has been said on this thread about “-Y” being unsupported and the 
command output could change from release to release … well, that’s a “known 
unknown” that can be dealt with.

But the fact that “-Y” was completely undocumented (at least as far as 
mmrepquota / mmlsquota are concerned) makes “-Y” one of those “unknown 
unknowns”… ;-)

Kevin

> On Mar 28, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Jonathon A Anderson 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Sure; but that only helps if you know the flag even exists.
> 
> ~jonathon
> 
> 
> On 3/28/17, 10:37 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of 
> Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services)" 
> <[email protected] on behalf of 
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
>    I thought the header rows defined what the format of the output was. Its a 
> bit weird as there can be multiple header rows for different content rows ...
> 
> 
>    Simon
> 
> 
>    From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Marc A 
> Kaplan <[email protected]>
>    Reply-To: "[email protected]" 
> <[email protected]>
>    Date: Tuesday, 28 March 2017 at 17:14
>    To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>    Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious few 
> officially!
> 
> 
> 
>    Just looking/scanning the latest (4.2.2) Spectrum Scale Command (and 
> Programming) Reference I only found a few commands that officially are 
> documented as supporting a -Y option:  mmnfs, mmsmb, mmuserauth.
> 
>    But as many of you have discovered, -Y is accepted and yields 
> "interesting" output for many of the mmXXXX commands.  
>    Moreover the output *seems to* have easily discernible patterns that can 
> be parsed by simple programs.
> 
>    I believe there is no guarantee that the exact command output formats will 
> not change from release to release, so, as a practical matter, if you're 
> going to parse command output, you're probably better off parsing the -Y 
> output,
>     even if that is not officially supported.  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to