> I know the presence of the -Y flag has been discussed there, so it’s a great > place to pick up tips!
Sure, and I “picked up this tip” at a community event; but really, it shouldn’t have to be picked up as arcana. It should be documented. Glad to hear that that’s the plan. ~jonathon On 3/28/17, 10:51 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services)" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Come to one of the user group events going on around the world in the next few months. NERSC, Berkeley, USA, 4th/5th April: https://www.nersc.gov/research-and-development/data-analytics/spectrum-user -group-meeting/ *** REGISTRATION CLOSES TOMORROW 29th *** Sydney, Australia, 27th April: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/spectrum-scale-user-group-australia-gpfsugaus- april-2017-tickets-29136246297 Manchester, UK, 9th/10th May: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/spectrum-scalegpfs-user-group-spring-2017-regi stration-32113696932 I know the presence of the -Y flag has been discussed there, so its a great place to pick up tips! Simon On 28/03/2017, 17:37, "[email protected] on behalf of Jonathon A Anderson" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >Sure; but that only helps if you know the flag even exists. > >~jonathon > > >On 3/28/17, 10:37 AM, "[email protected] on behalf >of Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services)" ><[email protected] on behalf of >[email protected]> wrote: > > I thought the header rows defined what the format of the output was. >Its a bit weird as there can be multiple header rows for different >content rows ... > > > Simon > > > From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Marc A >Kaplan <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" ><[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, 28 March 2017 at 17:14 > To: "[email protected]" ><[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious >few officially! > > > > Just looking/scanning the latest (4.2.2) Spectrum Scale Command (and >Programming) Reference I only found a few commands that officially are >documented as supporting a -Y option: mmnfs, mmsmb, mmuserauth. > > But as many of you have discovered, -Y is accepted and yields >"interesting" output for many of the mmXXXX commands. > Moreover the output *seems to* have easily discernible patterns that >can be parsed by simple programs. > > I believe there is no guarantee that the exact command output formats >will not change from release to release, so, as a practical matter, if >you're going to parse command output, you're probably better off parsing >the -Y output, > even if that is not officially supported. > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >gpfsug-discuss mailing list >gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org >http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss _______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss _______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
