JAB,
yes-this is in argument ;-) ... and personally I like the idea of having smth like setfacl also for GPFS ..  for years...
*but* it would not take away the generic challenge , what to do, if there are competing standards / definitions to meet
at least that is most likely just one reason, why there's no tool yet
 
there are several hits on RFE page for "ACL".. some of them could be also addressed with a (mm)setfacl tool
but I was not able to find a request for a tool itself
(I quickly  searched  public but  not found it there, maybe there is already one in private...)
 
So - dependent on how important this item for others  is  ... its time to fire an RFE ?!? ...
 
 
cheers
olaf
 
 
 
----- Original message -----
From: Jonathan Buzzard <[email protected]>
Sent by: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Cc:
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Using setfacl vs. mmputacl
Date: Mon, Mar 1, 2021 2:14 PM
 
On 01/03/2021 12:45, Olaf Weiser wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated outside the University. Check before
> clicking links or attachments.
> Hallo Stephen,
> behavior ... or better to say ... predicted behavior for chmod and ACLs
> .. is not an easy thing or only  , if  you stay in either POSIX world or
> NFSv4 world
> to be POSIX compliant, a chmod overwrites ACLs

One might argue that the general rubbishness of the mmputacl cammand,
and if a mmsetfacl command (or similar) existed it would negate messing
with Linux utilities to change ACL's on GPFS file systems

Only been bringing it up for over a decade now ;-)

JAB.

--
Jonathan A. Buzzard                         Tel: +44141-5483420
HPC System Administrator, ARCHIE-WeSt.
University of Strathclyde, John Anderson Building, Glasgow. G4 0NG
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gpfsug.org_mailman_listinfo_gpfsug-2Ddiscuss&d=DwIGaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=QInBVUG2345zpTXGAPvczeXAfnCgUNXuJEI_-wZlDDs&m=KN9CCGBxfu8z2xeIa5YiWGneEWPQdVKuxzCt0nOppOU&s=gtWdBqUTozWDxX6BOs4mukZVVDsHaL2vOYCj-xWaC04&e= 

 
 

_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to