On 2/16/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > Trying to clarify the my proposal: I was questioning what would be the > behavior you expect when the > following scenario happens: > > a class is mapped to a node type X, and the real node to which the action > (update or get) happens > has a node type Y, where Y is a supertype of X. >
If I understand you have the class Freelance inherits from Worker. Freelance is mapped to the node type nt:freelance and Worker is mapped to nt:worker. One Freelance object is used to update a node based on nt:worker. Is it correct ? IMHPOV, This can not be used in real application. I don't see when we can have this kind of situation. Maybe I'm a little bit tired. > Unfortunately this time I could not follow you. The scenarios you are > providing are the current > behavior or what you would expect to happen? > Following my previous mail, I think scenario 2 et 3 are not yet possible with our current implementation. -- Best regards, Christophe
