#: Christophe Lombart changed the world a bit at a time by saying (astral date:
2/16/2006 9:22 PM) :#
On 2/16/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
Trying to clarify the my proposal: I was questioning what would be the behavior
you expect when the
following scenario happens:
a class is mapped to a node type X, and the real node to which the action
(update or get) happens
has a node type Y, where Y is a supertype of X.
If I understand you have the class Freelance inherits from Worker.
Freelance is mapped to the node type nt:freelance and Worker is
mapped to nt:worker. One Freelance object is used to update a node
based on nt:worker. Is it correct ?
IMHPOV, This can not be used in real application. I don't see when we
can have this kind of situation. Maybe I'm a little bit tired.
Unfortunately this time I could not follow you. The scenarios you are providing
are the current
behavior or what you would expect to happen?
Following my previous mail, I think scenario 2 et 3 are not yet
possible with our current implementation.
--
Best regards,
Christophe
Hi Chris!
I would like to kindly ask you to review this thread later. I am not asking about the current
behavior. I was trying to figure out what would be the expected behavior. I more interested in the
expected behavior. The current one is in the code, is quite simple and sometimes wrong :-). But, at
this moment we are looking for what the behavior must be.
cheers,
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
