Hi Peter,
right, I was looking at the wrong place. Naively, I would think that ANY node 
of any way that has access=no would disqualify the way, would it take too much 
processing to take in account all nodes and not just a few select ones ? 

Laurent

PS: I’ll go ahead and just add a barrier=gate on those places anyway, it won’t 
hurt

On 22 janv. 2015, at 14:58, Peter <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Laurent,
> 
> barriers are handled but the border_control is not yet included in the 
> potentialBarriers list. Please create an issue to fix this. Best would be to 
> let me know some more candidates ;)
> 
> Here is the code for cars:
> https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/blob/master/core/src/main/java/com/graphhopper/routing/util/CarFlagEncoder.java#L76
> 
> Regards,
> Peter
> 
> On 22.01.2015 11:58, Laurent Bendel wrote:
>> Ok. The reason I’m asking, is that I modified a node on Openstreetmap, 
>> flagging it with: access=no, but the routing algorithm still shows a route 
>> going « through » this node. After a quick look at the code (what I could 
>> figure out), I thought that the algorithm would take in account those cases, 
>> but obviously not. What should be the tagging to force the routing to avoid 
>> a road that is closed at some point ?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Laurent
>> 
>> PS: the node in question is here:
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3272543050
>> 
>> On 21 janv. 2015, at 15:48, Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Laurent,
>>> 
>>> we update the OSM data roughly every day.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Peter
>>> 
>>> On 21.01.2015 15:44, Laurent Bendel wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> how often does the server at https://graphhopper.com/maps/ takes OSM 
>>>> updates from the central repository and recreates its graph ? because I’ve 
>>>> made some changes in OSM that I don’t see reflected in the results, so I’m 
>>>> wondering if it’s a problem of algorithm or just because it’s not updated 
>>>> yet.
>>>> 
>>>> Laurent
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> GraphHopper mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GraphHopper mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> GraphHopper mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GraphHopper mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper

_______________________________________________
GraphHopper mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper

Reply via email to