Ok, got it. Makes sense.
On 22 janv. 2015, at 21:03, Nop <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi! > > Access values are a secondary tag. In OSM an access value is not used on its > own on a node. The node represents some sort of barrier and the access tags > show which modes of travel cann pass this barrier and which cannot. > > The type of barrier also needs to be evaluated before the access tags - it > may already allow certain vehicles and rule out others. E.g. a bollard is > always passable on foot and by bicycle. > > I would consider a lone access tag on a node meaningless. > > > bye > Nop > > > Am 22.01.2015 18:59, schrieb Laurent Bendel: >> Hi Peter, >> right, I was looking at the wrong place. Naively, I would think that ANY >> node of any way that has access=no would disqualify the way, would it >> take too much processing to take in account all nodes and not just a few >> select ones ? >> >> Laurent >> >> PS: I’ll go ahead and just add a barrier=gate on those places anyway, it >> won’t hurt >> >> On 22 janv. 2015, at 14:58, Peter <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> Hi Laurent, >>> >>> barriers are handled but the border_control is not yet included in the >>> potentialBarriers list. Please create an issue to fix this. Best would >>> be to let me know some more candidates ;) >>> >>> Here is the code for cars: >>> https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/blob/master/core/src/main/java/com/graphhopper/routing/util/CarFlagEncoder.java#L76 >>> >>> Regards, >>> Peter >>> >>> On 22.01.2015 11:58, Laurent Bendel wrote: >>>> Ok. The reason I’m asking, is that I modified a node on >>>> Openstreetmap, flagging it with: access=no, but the routing algorithm >>>> still shows a route going « through » this node. After a quick look >>>> at the code (what I could figure out), I thought that the algorithm >>>> would take in account those cases, but obviously not. What should be >>>> the tagging to force the routing to avoid a road that is closed at >>>> some point ? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Laurent >>>> >>>> PS: the node in question is here: >>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3272543050 >>>> >>>> On 21 janv. 2015, at 15:48, Peter <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Laurent, >>>>> >>>>> we update the OSM data roughly every day. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Peter >>>>> >>>>> On 21.01.2015 15:44, Laurent Bendel wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> how often does the server at https://graphhopper.com/maps/ takes >>>>>> OSM updates from the central repository and recreates its graph ? >>>>>> because I’ve made some changes in OSM that I don’t see reflected in >>>>>> the results, so I’m wondering if it’s a problem of algorithm or >>>>>> just because it’s not updated yet. >>>>>> >>>>>> Laurent >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> GraphHopper mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> GraphHopper mailing list >>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> GraphHopper mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> GraphHopper mailing list >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> GraphHopper mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper >> > > > --- > Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft. > http://www.avast.com > > > _______________________________________________ > GraphHopper mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper _______________________________________________ GraphHopper mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
