Glynn Clements wrote: > > William Kyngesburye wrote: >> Building CVS today (last build a couple weeks ago). I'm getting a >> liblibr_li. I remember this from quite a while ago, but I thought it >> was fixed (ie renamed). I could also have just forgotten about it and >> noticed again just now. > > It hasn't changed since: > > revision 1.2 > date: 2006/11/21 22:41:06; author: markus; state: Exp; lines: +8 -13 > Serena Pallecchi/Faunalia: various fixes; r.li lib now shared lib >
In general, if such thing is known and easy to fix and original author absent, why not just fixing it rather than populating bug tracker and mailing list? Or is it complicated? Markus -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/r.li-lib-name-tf4741579.html#a13561661 Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@grass.itc.it http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
