Markus Neteler wrote: > >> Building CVS today (last build a couple weeks ago). I'm getting a > >> liblibr_li. I remember this from quite a while ago, but I thought it > >> was fixed (ie renamed). I could also have just forgotten about it and > >> noticed again just now. > > > > It hasn't changed since: > > > > revision 1.2 > > date: 2006/11/21 22:41:06; author: markus; state: Exp; lines: +8 -13 > > Serena Pallecchi/Faunalia: various fixes; r.li lib now shared lib > > > > In general, if such thing is known and easy to fix and original author > absent, why not just fixing it rather than populating bug tracker and > mailing list? Or is it complicated?
Because different people have different ideas regarding what is or is not a bug. None of the things mentioned in the bug tracker entry are unambiguous bugs or have an obvious unique "solution". -- Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@grass.itc.it http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
