On Jan 27, 2008 4:44 PM, Michael Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 27, 2008, at 3:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Markus Neteler wrote: > >> the x axis ticks in d.histogram are often completey messed > >> up, especially for FP maps with range 0..1.0 > > > > bug report for this: > > http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=1977 > > (note Paul had posted a patch there some months ago)
ah, I wasn't aware of this patch. Never mind. ... > > If I convert elevation.dem to a 0.0-1.0 FP map, the x axis tick labels > > are all still "0". :( > > > > #spearfish > > r.mapcalc elev.norm="(elevation.dem - 1066.) / (1840-1066.)" > > d.histogram elev.norm Fixed. > > Before we spend too much more time on this module, were there plans to > > reimplement the module as a wxPython program using one of the python > > plotting libs? > > This is a good idea. But with the improvements to d.histogram, it's > relatively low on my priority list over other modules like > georectification (me), digitizing (Martin), overall improved > stability (all of us), and NVIZ (who??). Jaro Hofierka once told me that he is interested in a NVIZ port to Python. Perhaps he could find students to be involved? Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
