Hi, 2008/2/24, Patton, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Is there any preferred way for using html markup for tagging module names, > parameter names, and flags in the document html pages?
AFAIK not really. It would be reasonable to define these rules and update SUBMITTING_DOCS document accordingly. > >From what I have seen, <b>, <em>, and <i> (or some combination thereof) > have been variously used to highlight module names, flags and parameters. > Although flags seem to be more consistently <b>oldfaced than anything else. > > For the sake of consistency between pages, and for a common look, I would > like to adhere to a common rationale for using html markup on these > descriptors. > > My own preference is to just boldface flags and parameter names; that seems > to make them stand out better when scanning quickly through the page, more so > than <em>phasis. +1 for <b>flag</b> and <b>name</b> * <em>module</em> or <em><a href="module.html">module</em> for external references * <h2>See also</h2> <em> <a href="module1.html">module1</a>, <a href="module2.html">module2</a> <em> instead of <em> <a href="module1.html">module1</a>,<br> <a href="module2.html">module2</a> <em> Martin -- Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa * _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
