E: >> Is there any preferred way for using html markup for tagging module names, >> parameter names, and flags in the document html pages?
M: >AFAIK not really. It would be reasonable to define these rules and >update SUBMITTING_DOCS document accordingly. >> >From what I have seen, <b>, <em>, and <i> (or some combination thereof) >> have been variously used to highlight module names, flags and parameters. >> Although flags seem to be more consistently <b>oldfaced than anything else. >> >> For the sake of consistency between pages, and for a common look, I would >> like to adhere to a common rationale for using html markup on these >> descriptors. >> >> My own preference is to just boldface flags and parameter names; that seems >> to make them stand out better when scanning quickly through the page, more >> so than <em>phasis. >+1 for <b>flag</b> and <b>name</b> By name, you meant any module parameter? > >* <em>module</em> or <em><a href="module.html">module</em> for >external references > >* <h2>See also</h2> ><em> ><a href="module1.html">module1</a>, ><a href="module2.html">module2</a> ><em> > >instead of > ><em> ><a href="module1.html">module1</a>,<br> ><a href="module2.html">module2</a> ><em> > >Martin Thanks for feedback, ~ Eric. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
