On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Glynn Clements wrote:

[...]
[3] For GDAL, I used its internal versions of the Zlib/TIFF/JPEG/PNG
libraries, and no other dependencies. So far as compiling GRASS is
concerned, you only need a minimal version of GDAL. You can always
replace the GDAL DLL with a more feature-rich version later.

When I compiled GDAL I used external libraries as much as possible, to keep the binary size down - but that was the only reason. For compatibility probably better to use the internal ones.

[4] Actually, I haven't tried using a pre-compiled Tcl/Tk binary. I'm
not sure that we should recommend the ActiveState version due to the
licensing terms.

I agree with that - it was quick and easy to get working before I realised how easy it was to compile Tcl/Tk on Windows anyway.

[...]
In the meantime, can we put the binaries for XDR, PROJ, GDAL and
Tcl/Tk on the GRASS site?

That would be good.

We really shouldn't be forcing people to
compile these themselves before they can even start trying to compile
GRASS. Especially XDR, PROJ, and GDAL, which are mandatory
dependencies.

On the WinGRASS wiki page there is a link to a binary package that I provided containing:
xdr-4.0-mingw32
proj-4.6.0
gdal-1.5.0
fftw-2.1.5
tcl-8.5.0
tk-8.5.0

However those versions are 5-6 months old so it would be great to get things up-to-date. And ultimately I can see us providing simple binary packages on the GRASS site, while people looking for a point & click installer could be directed towards OSGeo4W. I think that would keep server disk space requirements in check, among other things.

Paul
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to