On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 02:55:52PM -0700, Hamish wrote: > Huidae Cho wrote: > > its current name g."m"list (modified g.list) is somewhat awkward compared > > to g."x"list (extended g.list). > > I had always though that it stood for many-list. And in that light it works > and no need to change it- unless you want a way to make it obvious that > compatibility is broken and scripts using it may silently fail or > unexpectedly give a different result.
Exactly, that is why the C modules have different names. > > But I'll respect and take your word as for the author's original intentions. > ;) Thank you very much! ;) Huidae _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
