On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 11:55 PM, Hamish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Huidae Cho wrote: >> its current name g."m"list (modified g.list) is somewhat awkward compared >> to g."x"list (extended g.list). > > I had always though that it stood for many-list.
I understood it always as "multiple". > And in that light it works > and no need to change it- unless you want a way to make it obvious that > compatibility is broken and scripts using it may silently fail or > unexpectedly give a different result. Right. A flood of similar modules is a pain. You never know which one to take. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
