Hi,

2008/11/18 Paul Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> backport this?
>
> No specific ideas on this change, but if we're working towards a stable
> settled down 6.x then I don't think the type of miscellaneous cleanups that
> Glynn is doing in 7.x are candidates for backporting.

it would help to have releasebranch_6_4 in this case. Then these
changes would make sense to backport to develbranch_6. I am not sure
how close we are to *finally* [1] release 6.4.0 (I hope I will have
more time to fix bugs and to help with release issues).

Martin

[1] 6.2.0 31/10.2006 !!!

-- 
Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa *
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to