On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi,
2008/11/18 Paul Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
backport this?
No specific ideas on this change, but if we're working towards a stable
settled down 6.x then I don't think the type of miscellaneous cleanups that
Glynn is doing in 7.x are candidates for backporting.
it would help to have releasebranch_6_4 in this case. Then these
changes would make sense to backport to develbranch_6.
Yes, makes sense.
I am not sure
how close we are to *finally* [1] release 6.4.0 (I hope I will have
more time to fix bugs and to help with release issues).
Well I think there'll be time for bugfixes after the release branch is
created. But creating the branch means no new features so I guess that
needs to be finalised. I'm very busy though so won't be much help myself
for a while, sorry.
Paul
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
